Since Update of recent Google Panda, the world of SEO and blogs has been buzzing, and while there were some innocent sites between the fires, the only thing that most people will agree on is that Google has left once and for all the world knows that the poor quality, spammy content is not normal.
A side effect of the update is that if you have many links to your site from sources of poor quality, these links probably just lost most of their value, too.
Essentially, as link building SEO is concerned, quality is more important than ever now. But, after years of directories and article submission, some people seem to avoir forgot this link of quality in fact it is!
SEO has always been to try and guess Google and create links and content check all the right boxes. But sometimes, this may take a little too far.
Hunting algorithm is like chasing a carrot on a stick: whenever you get close, stick moves, and the core moves a step more from your understanding. Why not simply seek to wherever the carrot is directed and meet it when it gets there?
If you seek the same goal that Google is already moving to, each change future algorithm will only make your blog more strong.
Just imagine a moment that we do care SEO or all search engines. Front of SEO existence, when links were just links, what exactly is a link "good"?
In other words, if you tried to make money blogging and SEO was not in the image, what links would you care for?
In my view, the amount of relevant traffic generated by a link is the purest possible indicator of whether or not it is a useful link.
Here there is a real, giving point: whenever you win a new link, rather than trying to guess what the Almighty Google, why not just check your own analytics and see if you are really all traffic of it?
The links are essentially bridges of the Internet. And for some reason, people have begun to worry about most of what makes them look nice for the big guy in the sky, only to get people safely through the water. (In this metaphor, the water is the parts of the Internet which are filled with spam nasty sharks).
It is the equivalent of a small benevolent high street company to learn more about their advertising get prices in the industry that if advertising really generates any sales. There is not much sense.
If you do not already have it, install Google analytics (or something similar) and begin to look at where your traffic comes in fact. You should be able to see what specific sites and pages is sending you traffic. If you visit these pages, you can see the links that are sending you traffic.
In doing so, you will have an unprecedented overview in which links provide you with real traffic, and the areas of your site are most popular.
Then, look at the pages of your site that are popular and try to guess what you did to make them so. Also find unpopular pages and try to improve.
If you can learn what makes good content for your site, you can start most of this building. Any when you get many links from a page, try to build on this success and repeat.
You can also begin to spend more time to seek and establish a connection with the kind of persons who possess the types of the binding sites for you. Ask for links if you want, but you may soon find that you should even!
SEO and the strengthening of the links have a bad reputation because there are many ways to do and admittedly, some of them are quite scuzzy, as would say Mr. Cutts. But, in my opinion, SEO can and should be a good thing.
In the last few paragraphs, I discussed what I think is a powerful new way to think about SEO. It is not so much on pleasant algorithm as it is to find new ways to build real relationships and at the same time improve the quality of what you propose on the Web.
What do you think of this approach? You already use it? How's it going for you?
0 коммент.:
Post a Comment